Mounting scientific evidence suggests that prolonged exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation has serious biological and health effects – The Lancet

Screenshot 2024-11-19 at 16.33.34
Increasing electromagnetic smog – Lancet article

As the Planetary Health Alliance progresses, it’s time to discuss the global spread of artificial electromagnetic fields, especially the surge in radiofrequency radiation (mainly microwaves) from wireless technologies. Mounting evidence links prolonged exposure to serious health effects, yet most public safety regulations are based on outdated 1990s guidelines that focus solely on thermal effects. Research shows non-thermal exposure alters brain metabolism, electrical activity, immune responses, and chronic exposure increases oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cancer risk. Studies by the US National Toxicology Program and Italy’s Ramazzini Institute confirm these effects in animals.

Wireless communication use has caused radiofrequency levels to soar by 10¹⁸ times over natural levels. Technologies like 5G and the Internet of Things will further increase exposure. This unprecedented lifelong exposure raises concerns about neurodevelopmental changes, neurodegenerative diseases, and behavioural disorders in children, with prenatal exposure linked to ADHD-like behaviours, as shown in Yale studies.

The Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association has compiled the largest database of studies on these effects. Among 2266 reviewed studies, 68% found significant biological impacts, with 89% of oxidative stress studies confirming harm. This challenges claims that current non-thermal exposure levels are safe and supports the International EMF Scientist Appeal, urging the WHO and UN to reduce public exposure.

Environmental effects are also evident, such as declining bee populations, linked to electromagnetic interference affecting their magnetoreception. Anthropogenic electromagnetic fields might also disrupt natural phenomena like the Schumann Resonance and the ionosphere. Despite claims that non-ionising radiation is harmless, experiments show radiofrequency radiation damages DNA through oxidative stress.

As we tackle global environmental challenges, addressing “electrosmog” is vital. Some governments have begun regulating children’s use of wireless devices and promoting wired alternatives, but a coordinated international approach is needed to protect public health and the planet.

Full paper is found here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext?fbclid=IwY2xjawGplnJleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHeEaeS7kS2UUxEnfu__thPtwMbDNIsYM462gTD2T6i71BIOyY6Cl2-9wXg_aem_3DKgYyN-vSRWCa74Fn9IPQ

High-Tech Dreams, High Power Costs – 5G could consume 20% of global electricity by 2030

5G-electric-demands
Power hungry 5G

Achieving gigabit speeds requires 5G to operate on high frequencies necessitating millions of small transmitters and immense energy to power the network, process signals, and meet user demands.

Despite potential efficiency improvements the rise in data consumption, driven by streaming, virtual reality, and the “metaverse” is projected to push global electricity usage sky-high. Ultra-HD streams and VR glasses, while visually stunning demand far more power than their 4G predecessors.

Ericsson anticipates mobile data usage will grow fivefold by 2026 compared to 2020. By 2030 global data traffic may increase twentyfold, fuelling concerns about energy sustainability. Wireless networks also have a heavier environmental impact than wired ones, requiring significantly more energy per data unit transmitted.

Adding to this strain the production of 5G devices and replacing older technologies will drive the demand for rare earth metals posing further ecological challenges. Telecom providers already predict a 150-170% increase in energy costs by 2026 due to 5G infrastructure. A single 5G station consumes as much power as dozens of households, tripling energy use compared to 4G sites.

To mitigate these impacts the shift toward wired fibre-optic connections which are both more energy-efficient and radiation-free may hold promise. However as 5G adoption accelerates, the environmental footprint of this technology demands urgent attention. Can we justify the trade-offs for faster connectivity and immersive experiences?

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ErxDwhYYY/